- #We. the revolution controller support portable#
- #We. the revolution controller support psp#
- #We. the revolution controller support ps2#
They just dont want something to play games. I can gaurantee you as a consumer a lot of people looks at the other capabilities of the machine.
#We. the revolution controller support ps2#
Any one played splinter cell on xbox then went to play it on PS2 and Gamecube? Look how many exclusives xbox got because it was a more powerfull system. They claim you wont need all the power but in actuall fact developers are going to want it and need it. They might have the least powerfull console this generation. But how many people have smashed them down for that? No DVD, or CD capabilities, no hard drive (even in the Revolution). All they want is a console that just plays games. I think the problem with Nintendo is that they are stuck in their ways. I just happen to like the XBOX more now.but i´ve never had as much fun playing xbox as i had playing any of my previous nintendo consoles. Not to mention the fact that kids, nintendo´s main audience, dont care about graphics.īottom line Nintendo is runned by geniuses of the business and have been for the last 25 or so years. not to mention hosting some of the best games the industry has ever seen.ever played Contra on NES ? Way before LanParties even existed, there was nothing more fun than playing a co-op game in contra.multi-player at its best.over 15 years ago. there was one console system the kicked the crap out of every competition, NES, followed be SNES, followed by Nintendo 64. I give you the fact that nintendois falling back in the technology side of things with Sony and Microsoft pushing the standards, BUT, If you say nintendo is run by idiots, then my friend, you are 12 years old, and never even played anything pre-gamecube. Personally, I think they'll become a Microsoft-exclusive third party, just to spite Sony and the child of their brief relationship, the PlayStation.
#We. the revolution controller support portable#
Once Nintendo's grip on the portable market erodes, it's over.
What he didn't mention is that, six months ago, Nintendo had a 100% share. Obviously, he was combining the market share of the GBA and the DS: had he only mentioned the DS, it would be about 50-60%. Reggie Fils-Aime at E3 said that Nintendo has a 90% share of the portable market. Doesn't mean they've got any sort of market control. What business is Nintendo involved in besides video games? Sure, they're starting an animation studio, but they're tying that into their games: meaning, more animated Pokemon. Beyond the Game Boy, what does Nintendo have? They don't have the console market: Sony has a worldwide base of nearly 90 million PS2s, while Nintendo has 18 million, lagging behind the ever-unprofitable Microsoft's 19.5 million. Unfortunately, Nintendo is doing just that. After Sega, what has Nintendo competed with in the portable arena? Bandai? SNK? They were about as fearsome as the Republican Guard, without the reputation.Ī basic business maxim is to avoid putting all your eggs in one basket. Sega's portables were horrendous, getting maybe 2 hours before you had to replace your non-recharging AA batteries.
#We. the revolution controller support psp#
People joke about the PSP not having any decent battery life: they're about 14 years after their time. Nintendo ain't the only company posting a profit on video games.Īnyway, Nintendo makes money thanks to their 16 year control of the portable market, which is more due to inept initial competition and lack of interest from primary competitors than it is to their brilliant business decisions. Oh, and Sony Computer Entertainment is the most consistently profitable division of Sony Corporation. If Microsoft was losing money overall, yet still retained their share of the OS market, would you call them a failure? Of course not. First, you've got a fallacy in that statement by assuming that profitability is all that matters in an industry.
0 kommentar(er)
